Soon to hit the megaplex is "Sharknado 2," the sequel to the so-bad-it’s-kinda-good original 2013 made-for-TV blockbuster. 
The plot, so to speak, depends on sharks being lifted up by a tornado and plopped down in LA.
Chaos ensues.
While "Sharknado 2" opens next week — with a similar unbelievable storyline — Kansans are already familiar with our own improbable story, Barack-nado.
To the GOP, President Barack Obama is more terrifying than land sharks.
Obama is omnipresent — in anti-Paul Davis ads, and on the tip of Sam Brownback’s tongue, as he blames Obama for everything from the huge revenue shortfall to his unknown opponent’s 37 percent showing in the Republican primary.
Even though Kansas newspapers are having a field day in skewering this Obama obsession, it shows no signs of abating.  Rather, we will see negative ads and twisted story lines, all aimed at linking Democrat Davis to the president, whether these links are modest, tenuous, or beyond belief.
Why are the GOP, its financial allies, and Sam Brownback all so fixated on Barack Obama?
First, these scare tactics have worked before, especially in 2010.  Second, and more important, they have nothing else. Nothing.  Nada. Zilch.
If the governor could run on a strong record in an overwhelmingly Republican state, his reelection would be inevitable. But that’s impossible, given the results of his first term.
The Brownback record here is familiar, but crucial to remember, given the Republicans’ attempts to ignore it.
To recap, we’ve had tax cuts that greatly benefitted the wealthiest Kansans, and hurt the poorest. State income taxes were eliminated on almost 200,000 businesses, so attorneys, doctors, and out-of-state investors pay no taxes, while fast food employees and secretaries keep paying, and sometimes more.
These tax cuts have led to plunging revenues, far beyond projections. A year from now, according to legislative research estimates, we will be essentially broke. This means that more cuts are coming. And from where? From the places we spend the most, notably education at all levels.
The disappearing revenues have led to seven bond downgrades from three different firms. We’ll thus pay more for the money that we must borrow and that has been already used to help “balance” the budget.
The FBI is investigating several individuals close to the governor. What’s already come out is that great pressure was placed upon lobbyists to help fund the 2012 purge of moderate Senate Republicans.
According to one study, Kansas was one of only three states to decrease the rate of health care coverage, because we (a) turned back $31 million to set up our own exchange and (b) refused to expand Medicaid, which would have covered 100,000 or so Kansans and proved an economic boon.
We have rising levels of childhood poverty and record numbers of kids in foster care.
And then there are the governor’s consistently negative job approval ratings, the unlikely primary showing of Jennifer Winn, and a paltry re-elect number of 41 percent across several polls.
The governor and his supporters do, from time to time, make a case that his programs have worked, but that’s a very tough sell, because the plain facts — revenues, downgrades, etc. — present a much more persuasive, reality-based narrative.
So what’s a governor to do? Barack-nado.
But, it’s a tired old story, and one utterly disconnected from the realities of Kansas policies and budgeting.
"Sharknado 2" will have come and gone before the November election, but Barack-nado will continue to show up, unwelcome, on our screens, on our phones, and in our mailboxes.
The 2010 original was boffo, to be sure, but it’s 2014 and time to put away improbable story lines and outrageous hype. It’s time to decide on the actual record of the past four years.
But, never mind, and Barack-nado on.

Burdett Loomis is a political science professor at the University of Kansas and teaches a course on fiction, film, and politics.